
The Hapsburgs: The dynasty that literally took one on the chin
Austria’s most successful wedding planners
My article on Rome discusses an empire acquired by “accident” (each acquisition deliberate but not necessarily part of a master plan). That’s not even remotely the case with the Habsburgs. They assembled their empire with careful forethought and willingness to play the long game. They weren’t averse to brute military conquest, yet capturing crowns through strategic marriages was far more their style.
There’s an old saying (in Latin, so we know it must be authoritative): Bella gerunt alii, tu felix Austria nube ("Let others wage war; you, happy Austria, marry"). And marry, they did. These once-minor Swabian nobles hurtled out of the gate by capturing the inheritance of the extinct Babenberg dynasty (Austria and Slovenia). Next, they snagged Burgundy (the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, and chunks of eastern France) through nuptials with its last heir. From there, they married and bullied their way onto the thrones of Spain (with its overseas possessions in Asia and the Americas), Portugal (ditto), Bohemia (Czechia), and the Hungarian Crownlands (Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia, and pieces of both Serbia and Romania). Some strategic trades gave them most of Northern Italy, helping dismember Poland yielded Galicia. Along the way, they also got a lock on the elections for Holy Roman Emperor (more prestigious than powerful, but still a coup).
Not a bad haul over five centuries, no?
Amassing such a real estate portfolio was no walk in the park, but the Habsburgs were up to every challenge. If a legacy required an invasion to claim, they were in. If securing or retaining a title meant marrying an uncle to his niece, they’d do it. So long as the “purity” of the Habsburg line remained uncontaminated and devoutly Roman Catholic, they were willing to do almost anything to feed their voracious appetite for territory.
It was the work of eight centuries for the Habsburgs to assemble one of Europe’s largest and most emblematic empires. And it would take them just five years to lose it all. (We’ll come to that later.)
The Habsburgs’ final stand: Austria-Hungary on the precipice of WW I. Nearly every country has an emperor, king, prince, or grand duke—the last time this system of government would dominate the continent. There are plenty of monarchs around today, but their powers range from “permitted to meddle a bit behind the scenes” to “tourist attraction with fabulous jewelry.”
-
As if Central European history weren’t complicated enough, you’ll run into two spellings of the dynasty’s name: Habsburg and Hapsburg.
Habsburg is the correct way to write the name in modern German. But “Hapsburg” is no random misspelling.
Spoken German devoices syllable-final stops. In less pedantic terms, this just means when a word is written with a “b” at the end of a syllable, that’ll be pronounced like the letter “p.” “Hapsburg” is actually a better rendering of what you’ll hear when the name is read aloud (and is more commonly used by historians who don’t speak German).
So both versions manage to be correct and incorrect simultaneously—quite an accomplishment, to be honest.
NB: I grew up with the morephonetic spelling and must confess I’ve repeatedly typed “Hapsburg” while writing this.
The ultimate family-run business
The history of the Hapsburg Empire is quite different from the story of a single nation or state. French history, for example, covers the same lands from Vercingetorix to Louis XVI, with dynasties coming and going from the stage. Alexander the Great and Napoleon built empires from conquest, willing a new (and fragile) polity into being through generalship and hubris.
In contrast, the Habsburgs picked up, traded, or handed off numerous lands across the continent during their time in the sun. To be sure, Austria and its capital, Vienna, were always their most prized possessions. Yet their flexibility in adjusting their territory to suit the needs of the day set them apart from other grand European royalty. Up to its very end, no single national or ethnic identity defined their rule—they were cosmopolitan to their core, both a strength and eventually a weakness.
The family ran their empire like a joint-stock company in which the Habsburgs were the sole shareholders. There was always a CEO (whoever sat in Vienna), but there were plum jobs for many and the prospect of promotion for others.
Uniquely among the significant dynasties, they made room for women to assume positions of power. The number of female Habsburg regents and viceroys (plus one reigning empress) who played critical roles on the European political and cultural stages is impressive. The Habsburgs weren’t feminists in any sense of the word, yet this businesslike approach to gender (these women were shareholders in the family firm, after all) remains one of the dynasty’s few appealing features.
Caption
-
Description text goes here
A genetic shit-show
There are many schools of thought on why humans have an incest taboo: the psychoanalytic (it keeps sons from murdering their fathers so they can fuck their mothers), the social (exogamy fuels cooperation between family groups), the shamanic (a totemic animal can’t have sex with itself), and the neurological (an innate aversion between people sharing similar biochemical profiles).
No matter why the taboo started, it wasn’t until much later in human history that we understood its most crucial function: avoiding the sort of genetic overlaps that turn uncommon, recessive traits into frequent visitation in certain lineages.
That’s what befell the Habsburgs after generations of “keeping it in the family.” They routinely married first cousins with one another, often in “double cousin” pairings. Uncles and nieces might also get paired up. Each of us has eight great-grandparents; for the Habsburgs, those roles were rarely filled by eight different individuals.
The Habsburgs were thoroughbreds in this respect, and their devil-may-care attitude to consanguinity eventually produced children with marked physical and developmental disabilities. This was particularly true for the family’s Spanish branch, where the line petered out in a series of sickly and mostly impotent heirs. The infamous Habsburg jaw was the most obvious result of all this intermarriage (and something that numerous contemporaries were quick to mock).
How can one describe the magnificent weirdness of that chin? It could look like a garden trowel, a door wedge, a dustpan, a shelf for a tiny figurine, or a weapon to gouge out a rival’s eyes. This mandibular prognathism could make chewing difficult and drooling unstoppable in extreme cases.
A contemporary described its effect on Emperor Karl V: “His mouth, because his upper jaw was so badly aligned with the lower [meant] that his teeth never met. This had two unfortunate consequences: it made his speech hard to follow because he ate his words, and it made eating hard work for him because his teeth could not chew what he ate, which meant poor digestion and often illness.” Others observed that Karl cut his food into pieces small enough to be swallowed whole and that, when in repose, his mouth hung open like an imperial sturgeon.
The family jaw wasn’t fatal (like the hemophilia Queen Victoria passed to several European dynasties), but it wasn’t pretty either. Many of the Habsburg men were quick to cover it in a beard (although youthful portraits give the game away); the women just had to brave it (or possibly surrender to a Norma-Desmond level of delusion).
It was, however, the most visible sign of a much more severe underlying issue. Animal breeders calculate something called the “inbreeding coefficient” for their stock. This number captures the degree to which any individual is the product of crosses between closely related forebears — you might also call it an “incest number.” Technically, it expresses the likelihood that one animal (or person) will inherit two identical copies of a gene from its parents. As many recessive traits require genetic pairs to manifest, it’s a fair estimate of the danger an individual will suffer from an inherited disability or deformity.
Karl V, whose table manners suffered such a heavy genetic blow, had an inbreeding coefficient of 0.037. (The larger the number, the greater the inbreeding.) His grandmother, Mary of Burgundy, had six instead of eight great-grandparents. At the same time, his parents were third cousins (and his mother came from the already heavily interbred branches of the House of Trastámara).
He married his double cousin (his in-laws were also his aunt and uncle) and then arranged another double-cousin marriage for his son, Philip II. This produced Don Carlos, the physically disabled and mentally disturbed heir to the Spanish throne, who was unable to father a child. This unfortunate youth had just six different great-great-grandparents (the usual number would be sixteen) and boasted an inbreeding coefficient of 0.211. That’s dangerously close to the maximum of 0.25, reserved for offspring of a brother and sister or a parent and child.
The Habsburgs (both Spanish and Austrian branches) would struggle to produce healthy children thereafter, suffering unusually high infant mortality (even by the tragic standards of the time). It got so bad that popes started refusing to grant the necessary dispensations for marriage “within the proscribed degree” (i.e., where the incestuous nature of the pairing was too hard to ignore). When Don Carlos’s father, Philip II, proposed marrying his niece (hoping to beget a healthy heir), Pope Pius V tried to talk sense into him, noting, “We have seen that bad results always follow from these marriages of the first degree.” Philip went ahead anyway; of the five children born to the couple, only one survived infancy.
Caption
-
Description text goes here
The Habsburg’s highlight reel
Habsburg Europe’s history is so tangled and recursive that it defies mere mortal understanding. There were simply too many thrones filled by too many Habsburgs over too many centuries to shoe-horn into a straightforward narrative (although many masochistic souls have bravely given it a shot).
It’s much easier to tell the stories of just a handful of Habsburgs. Here are the ones who fascinate me the most—taken together, they’re a pretty good shorthand for the dynasty and its history. And I’ll be visiting many of them (in body, spirit, or both) on my trip.
-
Description text goes here
Frederick III (1415 – 1493)
Morose puzzle aficionado does his family proud
While not the dynasty’s founder, Frederick III glumly set the Habsburgs on their road to gold and glory. He was elected and crowned Holy Roman Emperor in 1493, the first of his clan to enjoy this honor. Few at the time would have guessed that these pushy upstarts would monopolize the imperial title for the next three centuries (excepting two short interludes) until the title itself was abolished by Napoleon. Frederick also got the Habsburg marriage machine up and running, securing one of the age’s most eligible brides for his son, Maximilian. Mary, Duchess of Burgundy, was her father’s sole heir and brought the wealthy (and strategically located) remnant of old Lotharingia in her trousseau.
Contemporaries agreed that Frederick’s political acumen was unencumbered by any distracting charisma or personality. But he left his descendants a bizarre idiosyncratic legacy: the inexplicable device of AEIOU. Any Western schoolchild will recognize the sequence of vowels. It became a talismanic label with elusive meaning but universal application in Frederick's hands. He put it on personal possessions, carved it into cornerstones, and (despite never explaining its meaning) convinced his descendants to use it for similar purposes.
Mysteries such as this attract conspiracy theorists, fabulists, and crossword fans in equal measure. AEIOU has been “translated” to represent Alles Erdriech ist Osterreich untertan or Austriae est imperare orbi universo (“All the world is subject to Austria” in German and Latin, respectively). Another theory is that it was drawn from a poem and meant amor electis, iniustis ordinor ultor (“I am loved by the elect, for the unjust I am ordained an avenger”).
Honestly, I don’t much care what Frederick was up to with this weird little riddle. I’d call it a desperate cry for attention or an attempt to feign intellectual depth, but most likely, it was just the sort of nonsensical preoccupation powerful men are prone to indulging.
It’s hard to get excited about Frederick as a dynastic figure, and indeed, he plays a small role in the Habsburgs' otherwise exhaustive celebration of their ancestors, mythical and actual. But without him, this family might never have mattered to anyone but themselves.
Caption
-
Description text goes here
Karl V (1500 – 1558)
Giving us control freaks a lousy name for over five centuries
This guy. One of the most perplexing Habsburgs (or indeed, European dynasts from any clan), Karl was the closest thing continental Europe had to a “universal” monarch between the heyday of Rome and the exploits of Napoleon almost two millennia later.
He wasn’t the worst of the Habsburgs (an honor shared between his son, Philip II, and his grandson, Ferdinand II), and he’s hard to thoroughly dislike (he often displayed a disarming sense of humor about his august self)—but he’s equally challenging to admire. Contemporaries loved him and hated him to about equal degrees. Today, his reign comes across as a tremendous missed opportunity: so much potential and so little to show for it in the end.
He was perhaps the greatest beneficiary of the Habsburg’s marriage program. In true Habsburg style, he inherited a smorgasbord of territories: the Netherlands from his father, one half of Spain (Castile) from his mother, the other half of Spain (Aragon) from one grandfather, and another grandfather left him all of the Habsburgs’ lands in Central Europe. But what would be the fun without still more exciting prizes to take home? Each of the Spanish legacies came with a bonus: two-thirds of Italy (courtesy of Aragon) and the ravaged lands of the Aztec and Incan Empires (courtesy of Castile’s genocidal search for gold in the Americas).
Most folks would celebrate this sort of luck or at least indulge in an occasional Mr. Burns-style chortle. Karl just looked permanently constipated by the task of keeping rivals, foreign and domestic, in check, managing the jealousies and conflicting expectations of his disparate realms, and passive-aggressively entreating his family to shoulder much of the burden.
The self-consciously devout emperor, who saw himself as a divine instrument, also faced a challenge on the religious front. Whether you called it a call for ecclesiastic reform or an outbreak of heresy, many of his German subjects challenged the Christian status quo. A neurotic Thuringian monk decided to work out his issues by nailing a manifesto on a church door (the late-medieval analog to Reddit) and kicking off the Protestant Reformation. This troublemaker was Martin Luther, who in earlier times would have been quickly burned alive (like all previous dissenters against Christian orthodoxy). Instead, this firebrand enjoyed the protection of powerful German princes, so his repudiation of papal authority and conventional theology thrived.
Karl would have doubtless preferred the option of public immolation to deal with this irritating malcontent. But international developments made a righteously vigorous crackdown inadvisable.
For starters, the scale and strategic position of Karl’s vast holding made his neighbors—the French specifically—very nervous. France had good reason to fret: it was now encircled by lands owned or controlled by the Habsburgs. A generation earlier, there had been five major European powers: France, England, Burgundy, Spain, and the Empire. The last three were now under Habsburg suzerainty, placing the French kingdom in peril. For the next two-and-a-half centuries, French diplomacy and war-making would be dominated by Paris’s mission to drive back (or at least contain) the sprawling Vienna-Madrid axis.
If Christian threats alone weren’t enough to put Karl off his feed, he also faced the burgeoning Muslim power of the Ottoman Empire in the east. The Ottomans fielded the most advanced army of the age, combining innovations in gunpowder weapons and heavy artillery to outmatch their Christian foes. They’d already swallowed the Balkan peninsula; now, they set their sights on Hungary, Croatia, and Vienna itself. In desperate need of troops to repel French and Turkish invades, Karl traded limited toleration of Protestantism for feet on the ground, allowing the Lutheran “heresy” to spread without hindrance.
All of this took its toll on Karl’s peace of mind. Initially, he’d trusted God to intervene to defeat all his enemies. The pure luck of the draw meant that it happened on some occasions yet not on others. Although he never relinquished the belief that he was an instrument of the (respectably orthodox) Christian divine, even this narcissistic control freak recognized he’d come to the end of his run.
Beset by scheming Valois kings, cranky Lutherans, even crankier Calvinists, and endlessly squabbling local elites from Bruge to Barcelona, Karl threw in the towel in 1556. I believe he was the only emperor other than Diocletian in ancient Rome to willingly abdicate his crown, peacefully transfer his powers to his heirs, and then retire to semi-obscurity. It’s worth noting that both men died in their beds.
Before taking his leave, Karl split his realm in two. His brother, Ferdinand, got the old Habsburg heartland and the HRE imperial title; his son, Phillip, got Spain, the Netherlands, and southern Italy. Two Habsburg branches emerged: the Spanish and the Austrian. They didn’t always act in concert, nor were their interests necessarily aligned. But together, they continued to menace the rest of Europe—and offered exciting new opportunities for the Habsburgs to interbreed.
Karl retired to custom-built apartments at the Jeronimite monastery of Yuste, deep in Spain’s Gredos mountains. The repurposed dormitory included a bedroom that “from the bed one would see the principal altar” in the church—a final example of Karl’s penchant for mingling religious devotion with stupendous narcissism.
The prepared quarters proved inadequate (and uncomfortably chilly), so after the ex-emperor’s arrival, his quarters underwent significant renovation and expansion. Karl did not derive much benefit from these, dying only a year and a half after he made Yuste his home. The cause was what contemporaries called “quatrain fever”—we know it today as the most severe strain of malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, transmitted by the Anopheles mosquito. The insect that delivered the fatal bite most likely spawned in the fish ponds Karl had requested be built near his rooms.
Maria Theresa (1717 – 1780)
Who’d fuck with “Take Your Daughter to Work Day”? Most everyone, it turns out.
Emperor Karl VI had a problem. His only son had died, and there were no other Habsburgs left except his daughters and nieces. There was no precedent for a woman to inherit his collection of titles and thrones; moreover, the electors of the Holy Roman Empire would never allow a female candidate for the imperial crown. The Habsburg lands, the work of centuries of his ancestors to assemble and secure, were likely to be parceled out among other rulers after his death.
To protect his daughter’s patrimony and keep the family lands in family hands, Karl devised a piece of diplomatic legerdemain known as the Pragmatic Sanction. He brokered deals with most of the surrounding countries and the great states of the HRE, trading concessions (territory, titles and outright bribes) for solemn pinky swears that no one would interfere with Maria Theresa’s inheritance. He also devised a clever workaround to keep the Imperial throne (mostly) in the family. Franz, Duke of Lorraine, was selected as the fall guy, marrying the presumptive heiress and promised election as Holy Roman Emperor after Karl died—but only after surrendering his family’s ancestral lands to France. Maria Theresa would later forgive her husband most anything in compensation for his sacrifice.
Karl’s optimism that the Sanction would hold water was entirely unwarranted. The names of the last two major European conflicts—the War of the Spanish Succession and the War of the Polish Succession—should have suggested the trilogy might logically wrap up with an Austrian War of Succession, which is precisely how it played out. After her father’s death, virtually all of Maria Theresa’s neighbors forgot their spit-sealed promises in the old Dynast’s Treehouse and closed in for the kill. Even the faithless electors of the HRE reneged, offering the imperial crown an upstart Bavarian, Karl VII.
The Queen-Empress emerged from the fighting with most of her lands intact, but only after nearly eight years of bitter fighting (plus a spin-off in 1756 called the Seven Years’ War). Her husband was elected emperor after the upstart had conveniently died, and Maria Theresa settled in for a long reign and lots of letter-writing.
The Empress was a reasonably competent ruler with a good eye for architecture and garden plans (Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna’s less-indulgent answer to the excess of Versailles, took much of its form during her reign). To the delight of her perennially truculent Magyar subjects, she even learned some basic Hungarian (no mean feat, given the language’s bewildering semantics and confounding orthography). And you can’t swing a cat in Central Europe without hitting one of her statues, many of which look spookily like Queen Victoria, with better headgear and a less grumpy mein. Yet she was viciously anti-Semitic (even by the standards of her time), and Austria’s Jewish community suffered greatly during her reign. Given where the specifically Austrian brand of anti-Semitism would lead two centuries later, this is possibly her most damning legacy.
Like too many powerful women, she’s been chiefly interpreted through the lenses of “wife” and “mother.” Her connubial side could indeed get…well, sort of weird (just wait until I visit her double-bed tomb in Vienna). And she refilled the Habsburgs’ depleted ranks by having packs and packs of children. Like Queen Victoria (with whom she is forever compared), she was an overbearing and intrusive mother, alienating some of her children through her hidebound conservatism while undermining the confidence of others with never-ending and excruciatingly detailed criticism. Despite Maria Theresa’s torrent of advice and admonitions, one daughter would still meet an undecorous end. Apparently, helicopter-parenting worked no better in the 18th Century than it does in the 21st.
Caption
-
Description text goes here
Marie Antoinette (1755 – 1793)
Cake? Brioche? The baker’s wife can’t read the room.
The Habsburgs didn’t only marry their cousins. Whenever they were blessed with a surfeit of daughters, they’d find the girls diplomatic matches that could shore up the dynasty’s standing with other great houses.
France and Austria had been at each other’s throats since the reign of Karl V. But the European political landscape had changed by the late 1700s. Spain was then neither Habsburg nor a credible military power, while Brandenburg-Prussia and Russia were flexing their muscles, upsetting the balance of power. The time was right for some fence-mending between the historical adversaries, and Maria Theresa had a daughter of about the same age as the French Dauphin.
This was her second-youngest, christened Maria Antonia, and better known to history as Marie Antoinette. Packed off to France at the age of fourteen, this child bride would be caught between her mother’s lack of boundaries, the profound differences between Versailles and the Hofburg, and the French people’s stubborn persistence in really hating Austrians.
The unfortunate Marie has been buried so entirely in the detritus of other people’s narratives that excavating the woman beneath is almost impossible. Was she naive, stupid, overly sheltered, or insensitive? Was she a monster of privilege or a pawn in a game that traded women like baseball cards to the advantage of others? For what it’s worth, I glimpse a sympathetic figure beneath all the distractions. Yes, she was inextricably mired in the solipsism of her class and could boast no intellectual prowess. But I also see an isolated girl valued only for what she could bring to some role (Queen of France, mother of an heir, dutiful daughter) and rarely for herself. Insecure and uncertain, she craved approval above everything else.
Instead, she faced constant disapproval from all quarters. Her mother blamed her for becoming too “French” (the whole point of this marital exercise) and for being childless years after her marriage. The French people called her La Austrichienne (a pun on chienne or “bitch), mocked her as “the baker’s wife” (the baker in question being Louis XVI), accused her of incest and child molestation (a purely political and demeaning charge), and then cut off her head in front of jeering crowds.
Had Maria Theresa lived to see it, I’m sure she’d have also found a way to blame her daughter for this last indignity.
Caption
-
Description text goes here
Franz Josef I (1830 – 1916)
A snoozefest series finale for The Real Habsburgs of Vienna
This fussy little martinet shepherded the Habsburgs into irrelevance and inertia. Franz Josef, Emperor and King, had all the best qualities of a civil servant: diligence, a fetish for procedure, a delight in minutiae, and few signs of a compromising imagination. Suppose you were overcharged for a bus pass. In that case, I’m sure he’d resolve the matter competently once all the forms had been completed, and the necessary signatures had been obtained. His devotion to the intricate “Spanish” court ritual fetishized by the Austrian Habsburgs was so profound it overwhelmed common sense and self-preservation. Franz Josef suffered from asthma and, upon suffering a near-fatal attack, used what might have been his last words to disapprovingly hiss “Waistcoat!” at his doctor—who’d rushed to the emperor’s side in a dressing gown instead of the garments appropriate for an imperial audience.
This was the sort of fellow on which the future of the Habsburgs rested. Could anyone have been surprised when they soon came to an inglorious end?
It was utterly beyond him to lead an anachronistic empire (sorry, a “dual monarchy,” as I’ll explain below) into an age with scant respect for pedigrees and bejeweled metal haberdashery. Dying one day short of 68 years on the throne, Franz Josef enjoyed a placid longevity that lulled his subjects into delusion. Nothing could change while he wore the crown, so maybe change wasn’t that urgent of a need after all?
Ironically, Franz Josef presided over a country that had already been fundamentally transformed—just not along particularly modern lines. The Crown of St. Stephen (the historical Hungarian monarchy) was one of the Habsburgs' most essential acquisitions—indeed, much of their power and prestige was derived from this title. Looking at a map of Europe today, this probably seems strange: Hungary is another “pocket” country in Central Europe, not much larger than its neighbors and occupying lands of little strategic value. But the lands of the Hungarian Crown were far more extensive. They included not only modern Hungary but also the countries of Slovakia and Croatia, along with big chunks of Romania and Serbia. In fact, the Hungarian crownlands comprised at least half of the Habsburg possessions in the 19th Century, giving the Magyars incredible leverage when their time finally came.
They’d never fully reconciled themselves to Austrian rule and had unsuccessfully sought to escape it many times over the centuries. But in 1867, they got their way without bloodshed. Austria had recently lost two wars, one in Italy (ceding their North Italian lands to the new Kingdom of Italy) and the other in Germany (opening the door for Prussia to unify all the other German-speaking states). Their back against the wall, the Habsburgs were forced to grant Hungary equal status in a new dual monarchy.
This is the “Austria-Hungary” you’ll see on maps of Europe before the First World War. The lands of the Hungarian Crown got nearly total autonomy, sharing only a foreign policy and a monarch with the rest of the Empire. Everything that wasn’t Hungary, clumsily called Cisleithnia (“on this side of the Leithe River”—Hungary’s historical western boundary), was controlled by Vienna. The official term was kaiserlich und königlich (“imperial and royal”), reflected in the acronym KuK on official documents and buildings of the time. Hungary immediately built a grandiose pseudo-Gothic parliament in Budapest and did its best to overshadow its German counterpart.
This didn’t solve Austria-Hungary’s fundamental problem: it was still a multi-ethnic state in an era of growing nationalism. Cisleithenia was run by its German population, but included Czechs, Slovenians, Poles, Italians, and (tragically) both Bosnians and Serbs. Hungary ruled Croats, Slovaks, Romanians, and its own Serbs with an iron fist, subjecting all these minorities to Magyarization (forced linguistic and cultural assimilation) and treating their subject peoples with a contempt even the Austrians/Cisleithenians were unable to match.
If Austria-Hungary was going to survive, it needed far more radical transformation, possibly into a federal state that abandoned the borders set down in medieval times. But that would require vision and bravery…something the Emperor was incapable of offering, preferring to waste his time berating his physicians for being underdressed
Caption
-
Description text goes here
-
Header: Austrian Grenadiers, print, Johann Christoph Erhard, after Philipp von Stubenrauch (MET, 49.100.4) — available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Austrian_Grenadiers_MET_DP824381.jpg